Written by Kyle Slagley
Certain movies fall into a group of “cult following staples,”
if you will. Among this group you will find films like Boondock Saints, The Big Lebowski, almost any movie
made by either Quentin
Tarantino or Kevin
Smith, and also American Psycho.
American Psycho started
as a novel
by Bret Easton Ellis that was published in 1991. It is a
stream-of-consciousness novel, narrated by the main character Patrick Bateman.
The film, released in 2000 and starring Christian Bale, follows the same
formula. The plots are also largely the same. Bateman is a 27-year-old Wall
Street protégé by day, and a sadistic serial killer by night. Both the novel
and the film were intended to be satirical interpretations of the narcissistic,
yuppie culture of the late ‘80s, and they both do a very good job of that…if
you can get past just how disturbing the plots are.
I won’t ruin the ending for you, but suffice it to say it’s
equally surreal.
Because the movie was, well, disturbing, imagine my surprise
when I read about American Psycho: The
Musical earlier this week. You read that correctly. American Psycho: The Musical is an actual thing, it’s currently in
rehearsals, and stars Matt
Smith, who has spent the last three years growing his fame playing the
infamous Doctor
Who. The show is set to run at the Almeida Theatre in London from December
3 of this year through January 25, 2014.
No word yet on if American
Psycho will make its way across the pond to Broadway, but if you’re really
curious, the show’s director Rupert Goold has been tweeting photos from
rehearsals that you can check out on
his feed.
Written by Kyle Slagley
There has long been a crossover between Hollywood and
Broadway—whether it be actors like Neil
Patrick Harris, Nathan
Lane, Hugh
Jackman, or most recently Tom
Hanks jumping from the stage to the screen, or directors like Sam
Mendes who flit from behind the curtain to behind the camera. Stories
themselves also transcend mediums and anyone who knows anything about theatre
can also rattle off a half a dozen shows that are also movies: Sound
of Music, Lion
King, Big
Fish, Legally
Blonde, Chicago,
and yes, even Shrek.
Although it got very mixed reviews from critics and
theatergoers—which are pretty much the same thing since theatre fans are some
of the most critical people I know—the box office success of Les
Miserables has more than likely opened the floodgates from a steady trickle
to what will be a full-out tsunami of shows turned movies and movies turned shows.
One that I am looking forward to in particular is the Christmas
2014 release of Into the
Woods, which looks to have a powerhouse Hollywood cast lined up. The show
takes the storylines from Cinderella,
Jack and the Beanstalk, Little Red Riding Hood, and Rapunzel and weaves them all together
using original characters The Baker and his wife, who are pitted against a
witch. I mean, you can’t have a good fairy tale without a witch, right?
It seems to me that films like this—ones that take a very
well-known musical with a hyper-devoted following and put it on screen—usually
appeal to only one audience, either the film crowd or the theatre crowd, but
rarely both. In order to make money at the box office, filmmakers are now
padding the cast with Hollywood A-listers. It seems to me that this will
further entice moviegoers to see it, but in the long run as the trend
continues, it will alienate the theatre crowd. Though there is obviously a lot
more money in getting movie buffs to the movies than getting theatre buffs to
the movies.
It remains to be seen how much of the original Stephen
Sondheim music from the stage production makes it into the film, or how much
the actors will sing. Rest assured, though, that if the film makes money (and
with a cast like that, it will), it’s only a matter of time before we see Russell
Brand taking on the role of Rum
Tum Tugger.
Written by Kyle Slagley
For your patrons who, like me, have affection for theatre,
this is an exciting time of year. The Tony Award nominees are going to be
announced on April 30 by Jesse Tyler Ferguson and Sutton Foster.
I am by no means a Broadway authority, but here are some
musicals to watch this year. Most of them also happen either to be based on a
movie or have a movie adaptation.
Kinky Boots –
based on the 2006
film that you didn’t even know existed, this musical tells the story of
Charlie Price, a young man who inherits his father’s shoe factory that is
nearly bankrupt. With the help of Lola, they revitalize the business by
developing a fantastic line of shoes for a very niche market – drag queens.
Despite the name, the show isn’t all that risqué and will likely be up for Best
New Musical.
Jekyll and Hyde –
You know the story, but did you know the original production starred Mr.
Baywatch himself, David Hasselhoff? The original show ran for three and a half
years with over 1,500 performances. The soundtrack
and a DVD
from the original cast are still available, and a rerecording with the revival
cast wouldn’t surprise me since this show will be in the running for Best
Revival of a Musical.
Breakfast at Tiffany’s
– Who could forget the classic
film with Audrey Hepburn? It’s arguably the first film people think of when
someone says her name. Starring Emilia Clarke ( Game of Thrones) as Miss Holly Golightly, this production will almost certainly be
in the running for Best New Play.
Cat on a Hot Tin Roof – Although the
play itself has gotten mediocre reviews, it’s likely that Scarlett
Johansson will receive a nom for Best Actress; whether she’ll win is
another story. The show itself is eligible for Best Revival of a Play, but with
competitors like Alan
Cumming’s creepy-awesome interpretation of MacBeth, Al
Pacino’s Glengarry Glen Ross, and
Jim
Parsons’s Harvey, it may or may
not make the initial cut.
|